Evaluation of pulse wave velocity for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events in post-infarcted patients; comparison of oscillometric and MRI methods.

Increased aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) has been proved as a strong predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients after myocardial infarction (MI). Due to the various technical approaches the level of high PWV values show significant differences. We evaluated the cut-off PWV values for MACE prediction using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and oscillometric methods for validating the prognostic value of high PWV in post-infarcted patients. Phase contrast imaging (PCI) and oscillometric based Arteriograph (AG) were compared in this 6 years follow-up study, including 75 consecutive patients of whom 49 suffered previous ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Patients received follow-up for MACE comprising all-cause death, non-fatal MI, ischemic stroke, hospitalization for heart failure and coronary revascularization. An acceptable agreement and significant correlation (rho: 0.332, p < 0.01) was found between AG and CMR derived PWV values. The absolute values, however, were significantly higher for AG (median (IQR): 10.4 (9.2-11.9) vs 6.44 (5.64-7.5) m/s; p < 0.001). Totally 51 MACE events occurred during the 6 years follow-up period in post-infarcted patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis in both methods showed significantly lower event-free survival in case of high PWV (CMR: >6.47 m/s, AG: >9.625 m/s, p < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate Cox regression revealed PWV as a predictor of MACE (PWV CMR hazard ratio (HR): 1.31 (CI: 1.1-1.7), PWV AG HR: 1.24 (CI: 1.0-1.5), p < 0.05, respectively). Increased PWV derived by AG and CMR methods are feasible for MACE prediction in post-infarcted patients. However, adjusted cut-off values of PWV are recommended for different techniques to improve individual risk stratification.

Effectiveness and safety of anti-ischemic trimetazidine in patients with stable angina pectoris and Type 2 diabetes.

Aim & methods: This 6-month prospective, observational, noninterventional, open-label clinical study assessed the effectiveness/safety of trimetazidine in 737 patients with stable angina pectoris and Type 2 diabetes mellitus (OGYI/51534-1/2014). RESULTS: Trimetazidine-based therapy was effective in stable coronary artery disease, with significant improvements from baseline (p < 0.05) in: number of angina attacks/week (2.9 ± 2.4 vs 1.1 ± 1.6), angina severity (Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification 1.9 ± 0.8 vs 1.2 ± 0.8), exercise capacity (metabolic equivalents 6.1 ± 1.7 vs 6.5 ± 1.7), and exercise-induced myocardial ischemia (min 5.5 ± 2.5 vs 6.5 ± 2.6). DISCUSSION: Trimetazidine treatment significantly (p < 0.05) improved glucose metabolism, lowered HbA1c (7.1 ± 1.1% vs 6.6 ± 1.0%), glucose levels (7.7 ± 2.1 mmol/l vs 6.9 ± 1.6 mmol/l) and decreased arterial stiffness (pulse wave velocity 11.2 ± 2.1 m/s vs 10.4 ± 2.2 m/s). In most patients, the tolerability of trimetazidine was rated as excellent to good, with a low incidence of adverse events.

Early morphologic and functional changes of atherosclerosis in systemic sclerosis-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Cardiopulmonary manifestations have an important impact on the life expectancy of SSc patients. Functional and morphological macrovascular changes may appear early before the development of ischaemic symptoms. Several non-invasive methods are used in cardiovascular risk assessment. Heterogeneous data are available regarding these in SSc. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to characterize the importance of atherosclerosis in SSc. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify controlled studies on carotid intima-media thickness, flow- or nitrate-induced vasodilatation (flow-mediated dilatation, nitroglycerine-mediated dilatation), pulse wave velocity, augmentation index and ankle-brachial pressure index. Outcomes were pooled with the random-effects model. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies comprising a total of 1292 SSc patients qualified. Intima-media thickness, pulse wave velocity and ankle-augmentation index were higher and flow-mediated dilatation lower in SSc patients [standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.65 (95% CI: 0.29, 1.01), 0.62 (95% CI: 0.35, 0.88), 0.96 (95% CI: 0.45, 1.47) and -0.68 (95% CI: -1.39, -0.34), respectively, P < 0.01 for each]. Nitroglycerine-mediated dilatation and ankle-brachial pressure index were lower, but not significantly [SMD: -0.16 (95% CI: -0.50, 0.18) and -0.39 (95% CI: -0.91, 0.13), respectively]. Data showed high to moderate inconsistency and significant heterogeneity. Meta-regression analysis of the SMD and the disease duration found a regression coefficient of 0.086, P = 0.014, confirming that parameters of the included SSc population may have contributed to the heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Meta-analysis of the published observational studies confirms that abnormalities attributable to macrovascular involvement are significantly more prevalent in SSc patients compared with controls. Considering the increasing importance of cardiovascular disease in SSc, a more widespread use of cardiovascular risk assessment is warranted.